Skip to main content Skip to secondary navigation

Browse Stanford technologies available for licensing:

Explore TechFinder!

FAQ: Inventors

Frequently Asked Questions: Inventors

Main content start

Find answers below to commonly asked questions from inventors. Don't see what you're looking for? Visit our Contact Us page.

Inventor FAQ - Table of Contents

1. Invention Disclosures and Status

2. Inventorship and Ownership

3. Patent Applications

4. Licensing and Negotiations

5. Consulting and Startups

6. Equity & Taxes

Invention Disclosures and Status:

Back to FAQ Table of Contents

Why should I disclose an invention to OTL?

Stanford faculty, staff or students should disclose an invention to OTL if they believe their research could be commercialized for public use and benefit. University inventions are typically in the very early stages of development and require a significant investment before bringing a product to market. Intellectual property protection often provides the necessary incentive for a company to pursue such a project.

The University's Inventions, Patents, and Licensing Policy requires that potentially patentable inventions be disclosed on a timely basis to the University. This allows the University to fulfill its obligations both to the Federal Government under the Bayh-Dole law and to other companies or organizations that sponsor research at Stanford.

Alternatively, inventors may place their inventions in the public domain if they believe that would be in the best interest of technology transfer and if doing so is not in violation of the terms of any agreements that supported or were related to the work.

Do the Inventors benefit from licensing the invention?

Per Stanford’s Department of Research Policy on Inventions, Patents, and Licensing, revenues from license fees, royalties and equity – minus OTL’s administrative fee and any unreimbursed expenses – are shared with the inventors (See "Royalty Sharing" on our Stanford Policies page).

How should I disclose an invention to OTL?

The online disclosure form can be found on the Researcher Portal.

When should I disclose an invention to OTL?

You should complete an Invention and Technology Disclosure whenever you feel you have discovered something unique with possible commercial value. This should be done well before presenting the discovery through publications, poster sessions, conferences, or other communications. Once the invention is publicly disclosed (i.e. published or presented in some written form to non-Stanford listeners), potential patent rights are limited. Be sure to inform OTL of any imminent or prior presentation, lecture, poster, abstract, website description, research proposal, dissertation/masters thesis, publication, or other public presentation of the invention. Please note that a thesis is considered a publication even if it is embargoed.

The U.S. now has a “first inventor to file” system. While this system does preserve a nominal one-year grace period for an inventor to file a patent application in the U.S. after making a public disclosure, OTL feels that it makes sense to proceed as if the U.S. had transitioned to a true “first to file” system. For this reason, OTL will not file a patent application on subject matter that has been published.

How can I find out the status of my invention?

You can check the Researcher Portal. While logged in, under the Inventions tab, you can learn the status of your inventions, including patents, licenses and marketing efforts. You can also update your contact information in the Researcher Portal (please provide us with your Stanford email as well as an alternate email, such as your personal email, and/or phone number in case you leave Stanford and we need to contact you about a disclosure you made while at Stanford).

Inventorship and Ownership:

Back to FAQ Table of Contents

How will we know who the inventors should be? Does inventorship "order" matter?

Authorship of a scientific publication and inventorship have different criteria and are not equivalent. Inventorship is a matter of law, depending on what is specifically claimed in the patent as written. A patent that fails to name the correct inventors may be ruled invalid under certain circumstances. The law does not recognize individuals as inventors who merely follow someone else's instructions or simply provide lab space, funding and/or equipment. Because patent claims may change while the patent application is undergoing review by the patent office, inventorship may change as well.

For the purpose of your invention disclosure form, name any individual who has made a creative contribution to the invention. When necessary, OTL will initiate a formal inventorship determination using outside patent counsel. The order inventors are listed bears no relationship to their contribution to the invention. Additional information about inventorship can be found on our Patents page.

Who owns what I create?

Ownership depends upon the employment status of the creators of the invention and their use of University resources. Considerations include:

  • What was the creator's employment status at the time the intellectual property was made?
  • Were University resources used in creating the intellectual property?
  • What are the terms of any agreement related to the creation of the intellectual property?

As a general rule, the University owns inventions conceived or reduced to practice in whole or in part by members of the faculty or staff (including student employees) of the University in the course of their University responsibilities or with more than incidental use of University resources. The University’s copyright policy describes the applicable rules for copyrightable works. In some cases, the terms of a Sponsored Research Agreement or Materials Transfer Agreement may impact ownership. When in doubt, please contact OTL. Stanford’s full policy on ownership of inventions is stated in the Research Policy Handbook's section on Inventions, Patents, and Licensing.

Does the government have rights in the invention?

If the invention was created in the process of research funded by the government, the government retains certain rights in the invention.

What if I invent with someone who is not from Stanford?

Please include the non-SU inventor in the invention disclosure form and inform us of any related agreements we should review and/or technology transfer contacts from the non-Stanford institution. Absent any contractual obligation, we rely on patent law which allows joint inventors joint rights in an invention.

I have a great idea but I came up with it in the shower. Do I have to disclose it?

Under Stanford policy, the University owns inventions conceived or reduced to practice in whole or in part by members of the faculty or staff (including student employees) of the University in the course of their University responsibilities. “University responsibilities” often include ideas conceived off-campus, if they are related to your work done at the University. When in doubt, please call OTL for advice at: (650) 723-0651.

What is intellectual property?

Intellectual property, also known as "intangible property", is different from “tangible property” such as land, a building, a computer, etc. Intellectual property may be protected under the patent, trademark and/or copyright laws. More information can be found on our Intellectual Property Basics page.

Patent Applications:

Back to FAQ Table of Contents

How much does it cost to file and obtain a patent? Who pays the patent costs?

It typically costs $30,000 to $45,000 to file and prosecute a U.S. patent application. This includes patent attorney costs and the filing fees paid to the USPTO. If the technology is unlicensed, Stanford pays the patent costs. These expenses may be reimbursed by the licensee if the technology is exclusively licensed.

The patent attorney sent me a draft patent application, what do I do?

OTL relies on the inventors to review patent applications to ensure that they capture the invention. You should review the application to make sure that it accurately and completely describes the invention and that all those who contributed to the conception of the invention are named as inventors. It is important to respond to the attorney in a timely manner so that the attorney can make the necessary revisions and file the application in the patent office prior to any deadlines (typically before a public disclosure of the invention).

What happens if you don’t file a patent?

There are certain types of technologies, such as software and biological materials, that do not require patenting in order to be successfully licensed. For other inventions, if OTL decides not to pursue patent protection and/or chooses not to actively market the invention, the inventor can sometimes pursue development of the invention while the University maintains ownership. In such cases, the inventor typically pays all the patent costs. Your OTL licensing specialists can discuss alternatives based on the specific circumstances of a particular invention.

Licensing and Negotiations:

Back to FAQ Table of Contents

What is a license?

A license is a contract whereby the owner of intellectual property grants permission for another party to act under all or some of the owner’s rights. OTL typically transfers Stanford intellectual property through a license agreement in which the University grants its rights in the defined technology to a third party for a period of years, sometimes for a particular field of use, and sometimes limited to certain regions of the world.

How long does it take to license an invention?

The process of protecting the technology and finding a qualified licensee may take months to years to complete, if ever. The amount of time will depend on the development stage of the technology, the market for the technology, competing technologies, and the amount of work and money needed to bring a new concept to the marketplace. Because university technologies are often too early stage for industry to invest in, we are not able to find licensees for many technologies.

If OTL finds a licensee, negotiations can proceed quickly if the company can agree to the terms of OTL’s standard agreement (see Sample Agreements). From there, the timeline for negotiation is usually determined by how many contract provisions the potential licensee wishes to negotiate. Financial terms rarely require long negotiating times. But, it is common for non-financial provisions such as field of use, term of the license, or indemnification to entail more discussion. If terms are agreed to quickly, OTL has signed an agreement within one day.

What if more than one company is interested in obtaining a license?

Typically, a university does not have multiple potential licensees bidding on an invention. If there are several parties interested in a license, OTL will endeavor to either grant non-exclusive licenses or to accommodate multiple parties by dividing the field of use for exclusive licenses. Occasionally, OTL must choose one company among several choices to enable effective development; the choice will be based on the ability of a committed company to bring the technology forward to society as quickly as possible. Sometimes an established business with experience in similar technologies and markets is the best choice. In other cases, the focus and intensity of a startup company is a better option.

What are typical license terms?

Different inventions require different licensing strategies. For example, a basic new scientific tool likely to be widely used is typically licensed on a non-exclusive basis. In contrast, an invention which requires significant investment of resources by a company is typically licensed on an exclusive basis. The exclusive license provides an incentive for the licensee to commit risky capital investments required for product development. License terms for a startup company can be different than those for large companies.

Regardless of the type of the technology or the size of the company, Stanford license agreements usually include provisions to ensure that the licensee will diligently develop the technology. See Sample Agreements.

What is the role of the inventor while OTL is negotiating the license agreement?

During negotiations, the inventor’s role is limited. The OTL licensing manager will generally inform the inventors when they are in the process of negotiating a license agreement. He or she may also ask the inventors to help evaluate a company’s capacity to develop licensed products.

In the case of an inventor startup, the inventors do not participate in the actual negotiation of license agreements with potential licensees. This approach is based on the principle that Stanford faculty/employees cannot represent the company and the university at the same time. Therefore, the inventor’s role should not include representing the potential licensee or negotiating directly with OTL. In addition, if an inventor has a potential conflict of interest (COI), he or she will need to participate in a COI review. You can find more information on our University Policies on Conflict of Interest page.

Consulting and Startups:

Back to FAQ Table of Contents

If I want to consult with a licensee, what do I do?

OTL does not make licensing decisions based on consulting arrangements nor does it negotiate or review consulting agreements on behalf of inventors. If a potential licensee is interested in having an inventor consult with the company, negotiations would be directly between the inventor(s) and the company.

If an inventor is planning to remain at Stanford while consulting with a company, the inventor should familiarize themselves with the policies of Stanford and their school relevant to consulting activities. The inventor is expected to ensure that the terms of the consulting arrangement are consistent with University polices, including those related to IP ownership and employment responsibilities (See Stanford Policies on Intellectual Property for the different polices for faculty, staff and students). Faculty should also refer to the requirements for faculty consulting activities and agreements in the Stanford DoR Research Policy Handbook: Faculty Consulting and Other Outside Professional Activities).

Why does Stanford have COI policies?

Consulting and other outside professional activities can provide an important means of continuing education for the faculty and can provide them with a currency and experience in aspects of their professional fields outside the context of the University itself. These activities can also provide a mechanism for transfer of knowledge from the University to the public good. These attributes of consulting may make faculty better scholars and teachers. However, the employer-employee nature of the consulting process has in it the potential for diversion of faculty from their primary activities and responsibilities. Therefore, the basic principle of this policy statement is that there needs to be a limitation upon the time that a Stanford faculty member may spend in consulting. The limits set forth in the Faculty Consulting and Other Outside Professional Activities Policy are intended to strike a fair balance between consulting and regular faculty duties within the University, serve to safeguard the interests of both parties, and comply with federal regulations. These arrangements are Outside Professional Activities, subject to annual (or transactional) review by the University.

I want to start a company with my invention, what do I do?

Inform the Licensing Manager responsible for the invention so they can take that into consideration when planning patenting, marketing, and licensing strategy. Although Stanford does not give preferential treatment to its inventors and their startups, OTL and the University recognize the importance of the inventor’s role in helping to transfer technology and in evaluating the ability of a company to develop licensed products.

More information related to startups can be found in our For Startups section.

Equity & Taxes

Back to FAQ Table of Contents

Why do I get equity?

Stanford may at times accept equity from a company as part of the license issue fee of an invention(s). Net equity, i.e., the value of the equity after the deduction of 15% to cover OTL administrative costs, will be shared between the Inventor(s) and the University per Stanford policy. The inventor shares will go directly from the company to the inventors.

For more information on equity from the Dean of Research, please see DoR handbook on Equity Acquisition in Technology Licensing and Distance Learning Agreements.

For additional FAQs on Equity and Taxes from OTL, please see the supplementary Equity & Taxes FAQ.

Do I have to pay taxes on the equity I receive?

Maybe, as it depends on the value of the equity. Equity is considered miscellaneous income so you may receive an IRS Form 1099 (.pdf), CA Form 592-B (.pdf) ,or 1042S (.pdf) from Stanford. Depending on your citizenship status and your California residency status, you may be required to pay an estimated tax withholding.We will notify you in the form of a letter outlining these obligations. We send the withholding payment to the IRS and/or the California Franchise Tax Board as an estimated tax payment on your behalf. Visit the IRS website for more information on estimated tax withholding.

For additional FAQs on Equity and Taxes from OTL, please see the supplementary Equity & Taxes FAQ.

Who do I contact if I have questions about the equity?

Please visit our supplementary Equity & Taxes FAQ for more frequently asked questions about equity. If you do not find an answer there, contact your OTL Licensing Manager or the company contact named in the inventor equity letter with your questions.

Many FAQs above contain links to the Stanford University Department of Research Research Policy Handbook

If your question was not addressed above: Send us an email